Beeper's last attempt at iMessage on Android is here
The company says it won't try again if this solution doesn't work out.
What you need to know
- Beeper released a final fix for Beeper Mini that it hopes will both restore functionality and get Apple to back off.
- If it doesn't work out, Beeper said it will no longer fight to keep Beeper Mini alive.
- Beeper's plan will shift to focusing on its main app, Beeper Cloud, which aggregates chats from multiple messaging services.
Beeper today simultaneously announced a new attempt at fixing Beeper Mini and an acknowledgment that this one would be its last. The moves were announced in a pair of blog posts, one from the company and another attributed to Beeper's CEO, Eric Migicovsky.
Beeper believes that authenticating iMessage activations with unique product identifiers is the solution to keeping Beeper Mini alive long-term. That's why its latest solution asks users to grab registration data from a Mac that they, or their friends, own.
The company previously used registration data from Macs that it owned but suspected that hundreds of accounts using the same registration data made it easy for Apple to spot Beeper's clients.
"As much as we want to fight for what we believe is a fantastic product that really should exist, the truth is that we can't win a cat-and-mouse game with the largest company on earth," said Migicovsky. "We do not have any current plans to respond if this solution is knocked offline."
Migicovsky's statement represents the first time that Beeper has publicly acknowledged what many have said all along. Not many companies can go toe-to-toe with Apple, a trillion-dollar company with nearly infinite resources. Beeper, a small startup, definitely isn't one of them.
However, that doesn't mean Beeper Mini is dead. Migicovsky says that the latest Beeper Mini update turns it into something that Apple "can tolerate existing."
Beeper may be right. The latest update requires a Mac's registration data for iMessage activation and an older iPhone's registration data for phone number activation. Then, that Mac must be periodically online for when Apple's servers try to re-activate iMessage with the given registration data.
Get the top Black Friday deals right in your inbox: Sign up now!
Receive the hottest deals and product recommendations alongside the biggest tech news from the Android Central team straight to your inbox!
This puts Beeper Mini much closer to Bluebubbles in functionality than ever before, which has operated for years without Apple's intervention. Apps like AirMessage also exist but use a different method than Beeper Mini. Beeper's new update gives it a chance, but given how much public effort Apple has put into destroying Beeper Mini, it's also hard to see the company stopping now.
Today's release includes the fix we reported on earlier this week. It uses either the Beeper Cloud desktop app or the macOS Terminal to generate registration data for your Mac. Then, this data is used to activate Beeper Mini on an Android device. The data is simply used as an identifier — meaning that no messages or account data is actually shared with the Mac you're using for registration.
What's new is phone number activation, which returns in a limited form. In order for it to work, you need to jailbreak an iPhone 6/6s/SE1/7/8/X and go through a process that Beeper says takes 10-15 minutes. You can also either rent a jailbroken iPhone or buy one from Beeper. Of course, we advise you to exercise caution if going this route.
Even if this version of Beeper Mini survives, it's far from the simple and easy iMessage for Android clients that was initially touted. However, Beeper Mini could have achieved its main goal, which may have been to make a point. Here's how Migicovsky closed his blog post:
Though Beeper Mini isn't going to be fixed by Beeper any longer, it could be kept alive by indie developers. Beeper fully open-sourced the code, meaning that individuals could work to fix issues that might arise on their own, continuing the development of Beeper Mini.
Brady is a tech journalist covering news at Android Central. He has spent the last two years reporting and commenting on all things related to consumer technology for various publications. Brady graduated from St. John's University in 2023 with a bachelor's degree in journalism. When he isn't experimenting with the latest tech, you can find Brady running or watching sports.
-
Mooncatt Didn't we already establish Beeper is in the wrong hacking their way into an Apple proprietary service?Reply -
bradavon
No. Both the EU and US governments are investigating Apple for monopoly practises.Mooncatt said:Didn't we already establish Beeper is in the wrong hacking their way into an Apple proprietary service?
Companies like Apple, Microsoft, Google that use their services to squash smaller companies tend to get looked on dimmly.
It's bad for consumers too. Apple have created the iMessage mess in The US. It doesn't actually help iPhone or Android users does it. -
Mooncatt bradavon said:No. Both the EU and US governments are investigating Apple for monopoly practises.
That's different from the issue of Beeper stealing Apple services, and I've already made comments in one of the other threads to the effect of Apple and iMessages being nowhere near a monopolistic practice due to the availability of many other messaging options. -
fuzzylumpkin
Being the most argumentative doesn't necessarily mean you are right or everyone agrees with you, though.Mooncatt said:That's different from the issue of Beeper stealing Apple services, and I've already made comments in one of the other threads to the effect of Apple and iMessages being nowhere near a monopolistic practice due to the availability of many other messaging options.
Your opinion on this is no less or more valid than anyone else's, and just because you have proclaimed something doesn't mean "we've established" it.
I don't really think Beeper did anything wrong, they certainly did not steal anything. I also don't think that Apple are in the wrong for blocking Beeper from accessing iMessage. I do think an investigation needs to happen though, because Apple is in place to have a monopoly and it needs to be nipped in the bud. That is something we will never come to agreement on, though. -
Mooncatt fuzzylumpkin said:I don't really think Beeper did anything wrong, they certainly did not steal anything.
According to the article, you need access to a Mac (they even suggested using a friend's if you don't have one), and requires a jailbroken iPhone to trick Apple into registering their service onto a device they have chosen not to allow to use said service. How is that not theft? I would classify it as a form of piracy.
...and just because you have proclaimed something doesn't mean "we've established" it.
Wasn't just me, but most people in that thread were on the side of Apple. I wasn't even the first in support. Lol -
fuzzylumpkin
Using an Apple Mac to access an Apple service? How scandalous! It's not theft because nothing is being stolen.Mooncatt said:According to the article, you need access to a Mac (they even suggested using a friend's if you don't have one), and requires a jailbroken iPhone to trick Apple into registering their service onto a device they have chosen not to allow to use said service. How is that not theft? I would classify it as a form of piracy.
Wasn't just me, but most people in that thread were on the side of Apple. I wasn't even the first in support. Lol -
Mooncatt fuzzylumpkin said:Using an Apple Mac to access an Apple service on a non-Apple device? How scandalous!
Fixed it for you -
bradavon
And how many of those messaging services are used on half of the phones in The US? If there wasn't a proble, Beeper Mini literally wouldn't exist.Mooncatt said:That's different from the issue of Beeper stealing Apple services, and I've already made comments in one of the other threads to the effect of Apple and iMessages being nowhere near a monopolistic practice due to the availability of many other messaging options.
You don't understand how monopolistic practices work then. Having other options is the carrot big tech gives to claim they're not a monopoly.
Remember Internet Explorer in the 90s? There was still Netscape but Microsoft all but killed the company. Remember AirTag? There is still Tile but Apple is doing a good job killing the business.
Being a monoply does not mean there are zero other alternatives.
Besides tell this to the US and EU governments, you know ones with all the data in front of them ;). -
Rafterman00 Beeper should just hang it up. Apple will not allow this to keep working. Do not underestimate Apple's spitefulness.Reply